H V Nanjundaiah (1860-1920) (Part 2)

When Nanjundaiah was in Shimoga, a teacher got transferred from there. He was a great scholar, highly civilised, and a tutor par excellence. He was loved and respected by all. The people of that town had organised a program to felicitate him and they invited Nanjundaiah also. He happily attended the event. The next day, one of his friends, who was also a judge there, asked Nanjundaiah, “I heard you had gone there?”

Nanjundaiah: “Yes. Why didn’t you come?”

Friend: “Should I come to such an event? That man has two wives – he married a second one while the first wife was still alive!” he said in an accusatory tone.

Nanjundaiah: “Oh, so your objection is to the fact that he has married and maintained two wives? Perhaps you would not have had any objections if he had not married but only maintained them!”

This was a smack to that friend; the reason being that everyone knew about the friend’s philandering ways.

Nanjundaiah always had a mild smile on his face. The movement of his lips and moustache into a mild smile often acted as a prologue to humorous incidents.

Once upon a time, during an assembly of the people’s representatives, one of the members had brought a suggestion for social reform. It was like this: “The social evil of child marriage has become rampant among our people. We need to prevent this. If a condition is imposed henceforth that while seeking for admission in schools and colleges, if the students are married, they would not be entitled to freeship and scholarship and such students would be liable to pay double the fee.”

Discussions and debate started on this topic. Diwan Vishveshwaraiah was impressed with the intention of this rule. He praised the Member thus: “It is truly encouraging to see that age-old people like you seek such reforms.” A few others remarked thus: “If this suggestion is followed, the father of the girl would be penalised.” Nanjundaiah said, “Why should we go to such an extent? Child marriage will stop if a rule is imposed that those who give their daughters in marriage to such boys shall be imprisoned for six months.” The water bubble burst and the members burst into laughter.

On another occasion, another enthusiastic member argued that for the purpose of maintaining orderliness of the village, Government should give authority to the Police. Nanjundaiah asked him, “Would you serve food to the policeman if he enters your kitchen to inspect if it is in order?”

On another occasion, a member described about the nuisance caused by mosquitoes in the village. Nanjundaiah asked him, “Are you asking the Government to get a mosquito net stitched for you?”

Once a member argued, “The Government should get gopuras constructed to all such temples in the province that do not have a gopura, as there is a prescription in the Śāstras that temples without gopuras should not be visited.” To that demand, Nanjudaiah asked, “Good, will it be alright if the sweet porridge prepared in such temples as prasāda is delivered to your house?”

In this manner, Nanjundaiah would show the foolishness of the people by the means of decent humour.

Nanjundaiah was a compassionate man. I do not know if he ever got angry. While he was a judge, he would show reasonable compassion to convicts. He would grieve with the words, “The wife and children have to bear the brunt of the wrong committed by him!” Sri. Navaratna Ramarao has given an example to illustrate this. When Nanjundaiah was the Councillor, the Government received a telegram from a place called Yedathore (a village in Heggadadevanakote Taluk, Mysore District). A notorious dacoit in that region, who had absconded and avoided the police for several years, was finally caught. He was tried, and after sentencing him, the Magistrate sent the telegram to the Government and mentioned thus: “Glad to report that so-and-so was hanged as sentenced.” As soon as Nanjundaiah read the telegram, he angrily remarked, “Glad! It seems he is glad! He is celebrating as though a son is born to him! Let them prepare sweet pudding and drink it!” This was the compassionate nature of Nanjundaiah.

H. V. Nanjundaiah's house in Malleswaram:-Image Courtesy:- Google Image Search

I used to visit Nanjundaiah’s house every now and then. The manner in which I saw and understood the meaning of home, relatives, and family there, I have perhaps not experienced anywhere else. It was a huge building. There were children and elders in every nook and corner of the house. There would be some noise or incident that would occur every moment. Widows and old ladies could be seen moving freely everywhere. When I used to go upstairs, Nanjundaiah would say, “Sit, sit.” However, skirts and frocks of children, towels and undergarments, would be strewn all over the sofa. Because of that, I felt a little hesitant when I went there the first time. Observing that, he asked me, “Don’t you have children at home?” My hesitation disappeared. Many a times, when I used to visit him, I would see his wife standing next to him. Nanjundaiah would ask me to come in. I would hesitate and stand outside. He would say, “Come inside, it’s fine! Our home is just like all other homes, no exception,” and invite me inside. He was so simple and loving.

When he would work at home sitting at his desk, two children would have gone under the table and would be counting his toes or scratching or pinching his feet. Two others would stand on the chair and punch him repeatedly on his back. Another two would scream, “Appa, duddu!” Nanjundaiah would tolerate all this with a smile and ask them in Telugu, “Even for the sake of madness, what do you mean by ‘duddu?’ Madness!” It seems that ‘duddu’ was a rough derivative of the word ‘doodh,’ the Hindi word for ‘milk.’ Apparently, those children had learnt that word from the Muslim servants in the house. It took Nanjundaiah five minutes to enquire and understand this literary jargon. If one were to see his face at that time, one would know what real bliss meant.

Nanjundaiah was slow and steady by his very nature. He did not display urgency in anything. If he was informed that a mistake was committed, he would say, “Alright, so be it. We shall correct it.” If he was told that it cannot be corrected, he would say, “If that cannot be done, then, let it be so; what have we missed?” If he was to be then told that we missed something, he would quip, “Then what is the point of worrying? Let’s endure it.”

Once when he was travelling to Delhi, he had the thought of getting down near Nasik and taking bath in the Godavari river. He told his secretary about the same. He agreed that it could be arranged and when the train neared Nasik, he woke up Nanjundaiah. It was around 5 a.m. Nanjundaiah said, “It is so cold right now. If I get off the train now, it would only result in a curse to God. Let us take a bath while returning after I have committed some sins in Delhi.” While returning, when the secretary woke him near Nasik, he said, “I did not commit such a sin! Why to suffer here tonight?” Usually, it would be surprising to everyone if Nanjundaiah was on time whether to catch the train or to a meeting.

Nanjundaiah was an equestrian. It is said that he would travel long distances on horse. But as far as I have seen, he would go to his brother’s house which was opposite to his house—a stone’s throw away—and while being astride, he’d go near the portico and talk to the women and children for half an hour or just look around here and there before returning home. Many a times this would be his horse ride. On some days, he would ride till the Attaara Kacheri[1]. Such a ride was during on duty.

I also have something to say about Nanjundaiah’s style of work. For several weeks he would be engrossed in reading books and external administration. If he came to know that the files that have piled up have exceeded fifty or hundred, he’d go to his office early in the morning on his horse. It was enough if there was just a peon to open the door. He did not require clerks or assistants. He would work alone till twelve or one in the afternoon. He was thorough with all the laws, administration, and the nature of business of all departments, so he never expected anyone to assist him. Opening every file and quickly glancing at the important points therein were easy for him. As soon as he finished reading, he wrote the judgment with clarity and without room for any doubts. He did not require typists or stenographers. He could write with great speed. Due to that, files that had piled up for one or two months would get disposed off within a matter of a day or two.

I have already given an instance about his compassionate nature. Once, the Government had received several allegations against a Munsiff. A few government officials showed hostility towards that Munsiff due to personal animosity. These adversaries were interested in getting that Munsiff punished. Whenever that letter came before Nanjundaiah, he would write, “Provide the reply given by the Munsiff to the show cause notice.” Finally, he wrote thus: “Even a person accused with murder cannot be punished without following the due process of law and after a detailed trial. However, it appears that this poor Munsiff would be deprived of that opportunity.”

When he was in the High Court, he would try to find reasons to at least reduce the term of sentence if the accused could not be acquitted. He would either reduce the sentence to six months instead of a year or grant simple imprisonment instead of rigorous imprisonment, and in civil cases he would dispense with payment of court fees and somehow try to provide some sort of concession to the aggrieved. He did not cause harm to any one at any point of time during his official tenure.

An objection that was raised against Nanjundaiah was that of favouritism. However, I don’t know what the basis for such an allegation is. This allegation is quite common in our nation and is levelled by everyone against everyone. To my knowledge, there has been no incident where Nanjundaiah caused injustice to someone for the sake of helping his near and dear ones. There may be one or two instances where a few people may have received more than what they deserved; and there are several reasons for that. However, one cannot jump to the conclusion that the only reason for the said concession was his favouritism. In conclusion, it can be said that Nanjundaiah never had so many opportunities. The concessions or opportunities that may be shown by a Councillor or Judge would usually be minor. However, I have not seen anyone rising to a high post under the patronage of Nanjundaiah.

The appointments made by H V Nanjundaiah in the Mysore University are decisive proof that he only favoured merit. Radhakrishnan, Radhakumud Mukherjee, K T Shah, A R Wadia, M Hiriyanna, Sampathkumaran, Venkateshachar, C R Narayan Rao, Sampath Iyengar, N S Subba Rao – none were his “own men.” All of them belonged to castes or communities other than that of Nanjundaiah and all of them had already gained recognition for their respective areas of practice and subjects at the time of their appointment. If the Mysore University has earned the high status and reputation that it enjoys today, the aforementioned scholars are the reason behind it. The credit for selecting and appointing these great scholars should go to Nanjundaiah.

Sir M, Vishveshwaraiah :- Image Courtesy:- Google Image Search

H V Nanjundaiah and Sir M Vishveshwaraiah were friends. They both belonged to the same sub-caste. However, their points of view were different. It can be said that Vishveshwaraiah seemed to be in a great hurry when it came to progress and development. Nanjundaiah was not insouciant about development and progress, but he did not seem to have any urgency. Urgency, in present context, refers to the speed that exceeds our capacity and the existing circumstances. It was Nanjundaiah’s desire that the speed should be proportionately reduced to be consummate with the existing condition of our nation. Vishveshwaraiah had the intention to build the nation in the blink of an eye like the mythical architect Maya [who built Indraprastha for the Pāṇḍavas in a flash]. Nanjundaiah opined differently. He felt that ours is not paradise; the wall has to be built by laying brick upon brick, mortar upon mortar, and weighing each and every step. Vishveshwaraiah would not think twice before raising a loan on behalf of the state. Nanjundaiah was apprehensive of the liability created by debt. The striking quality of Vishveshwaraiah was courage. The striking quality of Nanjundaiah was fear of danger. Due to this, the two were not compatible in a few matters. Their difference in views, however, never came in the way of their friendship. Vishveshwaraiah respected and greatly admired the erudition, sincerity, and the dedication towards progress of the nation of Nanjundaiah and showed him high respect on all occasions.

Sometime in 1920, Nanjundaiah was bed-ridden due to ill health. A few officers of the University visited him. Nanjundaiah asked them, “What is the news of the hour? I haven’t read the newspaper for past three to four days!”

One of them said, “Shaukat Ali has gotten infuriated. Apparently, he will leave for Afghanistan if Indians do not agree to go on war in support of Khilafat!”

On hearing this, Nanjundaiah rose partially from his bed and said, “Is he going to leave? What is the point of stopping someone when they have made up their mind to leave? Let him go. Does he require any money for that? Let’s raise funds and give it to him!”

Nanjundaiah was courageous. He would never be scared of anyone while clearly conveying what his conscience believed to be correct. Deep analysis of all the possible questions on a given circumstance was his basic nature. He had assumed it as a duty to show that every question has two or three facets. Nanjundaiah would raise objection to the arguments advanced by the lawyer for his party. Similarly, he would object to a point of contention raised by the other party’s advocate too. The lawyers would be bewildered by this. Nanjundaiah would get quite excited in crushing the stubbornness of any advocate who tried to defend his case vehemently. Weighing the pros and cons was the special quality of Nanjundaiah, which he exhibited not only while discharging judicial functions but in all other areas. He was deeply interested in social reforms. He was of the opinion that our religious institutions need to be reformed. Accordingly, he caused enactment of laws for the purpose of reformation of the administration of temples and maṭhas. Yet he was not someone who had renounced faith. He would appear to be a traditionalist to those who were progressive and would appear progressive to those who were traditionalists. His multifaceted vision of various aspects, and maintaining a balance for each of those aspects, was the crux of his approach. His ideology was this: the restrictions in the State, society, and infrastructure need to be relaxed in such a way that they should not lead to the disintegration of the system. There should be freedom but with reasonable restrictions. This kind of mental disposition is what is called as “liberalism.” The crux of this ideology is that all human questions are two-faced; if even one among the two is rejected, it would lead to destruction. There should be development, but it should be achieved in an organised manner. There should be progress but not so quick that we lose track of our minds. This was the belief system of Nanjundaiah.

Nanjundaiah was the brain trust for the Mysore Party. D Venkataramayya, M Venkatakrishnaiah, and H V Nanjundaiah, all of them worked in three different ways in three different bodies to achieve the same goal. They were bosom friends and none of them did anything without the advice and consultation of the other two.


This is the second part of an English translation of the fifth chapter of D V Gundappa’s Jnapakachitrashaale – Vol. 1 – Sahiti Sajjana Sarvajanikaru. DVG wrote this series in the early 1950s. Thanks to Kashyap N Naik for his review. Edited by Hari Ravikumar.


[1] Attara means ‘eighteen’ in Hindi while Kacheri is an Urdu word for ‘office.’ Attara Kacheri was the name given to the government secretariat with eighteen departments.



Devanahalli Venkataramanayya Gundappa (1887-1975) was a great visionary and polymath. He was a journalist, poet, art connoisseur, philosopher, political analyst, institution builder, social commentator, social worker, and activist.



Vaishnavi Naik is a practicing advocate at Bangalore. She has deep interest in music, fine arts, and literature. She is a singer and is presently learning Hindustani Classical Music.

Prekshaa Publications

Indian Perspective of Truth and Beauty in Homer’s Epics is a unique work on the comparative study of the Greek Epics Iliad and Odyssey with the Indian Epics – Rāmāyaṇa and Mahābhārata. Homer, who laid the foundations for the classical tradition of the West, occupies a stature similar to that occupied by the seer-poets Vālmīki and Vyāsa, who are synonymous with the Indian culture. The author...

Karnataka’s celebrated polymath, D V Gundappa brings together in the sixth volume of reminiscences character sketches of prominent public figures, liberals, and social workers. These remarkable personages hailing from different corners of South India are from a period that spans from the late nineteenth century to the mid-twentieth century. Written in Kannada in the 1970s, these memoirs go...

An Introduction to Hinduism based on Primary Sources

Authors: Śatāvadhānī Dr. R Ganesh, Hari Ravikumar

What is the philosophical basis for Sanātana-dharma, the ancient Indian way of life? What makes it the most inclusive and natural of all religio-philosophical systems in the world?

The Essential Sanātana-dharma serves as a handbook for anyone who wishes to grasp the...

Karnataka’s celebrated polymath, D V Gundappa brings together in the fifth volume, episodes from the lives of traditional savants responsible for upholding the Vedic culture. These memorable characters lived a life of opulence amidst poverty— theirs  was the wealth of the soul, far beyond money and gold. These vidvāns hailed from different corners of the erstwhile Mysore Kingdom and lived in...

Padma Bhushan Dr. Padma Subrahmanyam represents the quintessence of Sage Bharata’s art and Bhārata, the country that gave birth to the peerless seer of the Nāṭya-veda. Padma’s erudition in various streams of Indic knowledge, mastery over many classical arts, deep understanding of the nuances of Indian culture, creative genius, and sublime vision bolstered by the vedāntic and nationalistic...

Bhārata has been a land of plenty in many ways. We have had a timeless tradition of the twofold principle of Brāhma (spirit of wisdom) and Kṣāttra (spirit of valour) nourishing and protecting this sacred land. The Hindu civilisation, rooted in Sanātana-dharma, has constantly been enriched by brāhma and safeguarded by kṣāttra.
The renowned Sanskrit poet and scholar, Śatāvadhānī Dr. R...

ಛಂದೋವಿವೇಕವು ವರ್ಣವೃತ್ತ, ಮಾತ್ರಾಜಾತಿ ಮತ್ತು ಕರ್ಷಣಜಾತಿ ಎಂದು ವಿಭಕ್ತವಾದ ಎಲ್ಲ ಬಗೆಯ ಛಂದಸ್ಸುಗಳನ್ನೂ ವಿವೇಚಿಸುವ ಪ್ರಬಂಧಗಳ ಸಂಕಲನ. ಲೇಖಕರ ದೀರ್ಘಕಾಲಿಕ ಆಲೋಚನೆಯ ಸಾರವನ್ನು ಒಳಗೊಂಡ ಈ ಹೊತ್ತಗೆ ಪ್ರಧಾನವಾಗಿ ಛಂದಸ್ಸಿನ ಸೌಂದರ್ಯವನ್ನು ಲಕ್ಷಿಸುತ್ತದೆ. ತೌಲನಿಕ ವಿಶ್ಲೇಷಣೆ ಮತ್ತು ಅಂತಃಶಾಸ್ತ್ರೀಯ ಅಧ್ಯಯನಗಳ ತೆಕ್ಕೆಗೆ ಬರುವ ಬರೆಹಗಳೂ ಇಲ್ಲಿವೆ. ಶಾಸ್ತ್ರಕಾರನಿಗಲ್ಲದೆ ಸಿದ್ಧಹಸ್ತನಾದ ಕವಿಗೆ ಮಾತ್ರ ಸ್ಫುರಿಸಬಲ್ಲ ಎಷ್ಟೋ ಹೊಳಹುಗಳು ಕೃತಿಯ ಮೌಲಿಕತೆಯನ್ನು ಹೆಚ್ಚಿಸಿವೆ. ಈ...

Karnataka’s celebrated polymath, D V Gundappa brings together in the fourth volume, some character sketches of the Dewans of Mysore preceded by an account of the political framework of the State before Independence and followed by a review of the political conditions of the State after 1940. These remarkable leaders of Mysore lived in a period that spans from the mid-nineteenth century to the...

Bharatiya Kavya-mimamseya Hinnele is a monograph on Indian Aesthetics by Mahamahopadhyaya N. Ranganatha Sharma. The book discusses the history and significance of concepts pivotal to Indian literary theory. It is equally useful to the learned and the laity.

Sahitya-samhite is a collection of literary essays in Kannada. The book discusses aestheticians such as Ananda-vardhana and Rajashekhara; Sanskrit scholars such as Mena Ramakrishna Bhat, Sridhar Bhaskar Varnekar and K S Arjunwadkar; and Kannada litterateurs such as DVG, S L Bhyrappa and S R Ramaswamy. It has a foreword by Shatavadhani Dr. R Ganesh.

The Mahābhārata is the greatest epic in the world both in magnitude and profundity. A veritable cultural compendium of Bhārata-varṣa, it is a product of the creative genius of Maharṣi Kṛṣṇa-dvaipāyana Vyāsa. The epic captures the experiential wisdom of our civilization and all subsequent literary, artistic, and philosophical creations are indebted to it. To read the Mahābhārata is to...

Shiva Rama Krishna

சிவன். ராமன். கிருஷ்ணன்.
இந்திய பாரம்பரியத்தின் முப்பெரும் கதாநாயகர்கள்.
உயர் இந்தியாவில் தலைமுறைகள் பல கடந்தும் கடவுளர்களாக போற்றப்பட்டு வழிகாட்டிகளாக விளங்குபவர்கள்.
மனித ஒற்றுமை நூற்றாண்டுகால பரிணாம வளர்ச்சியின் பரிமாணம்.
தனிநபர்களாகவும், குடும்ப உறுப்பினர்களாகவும், சமுதாய பிரஜைகளாகவும் நாம் அனைவரும் பரிமளிக்கிறோம்.
சிவன் தனிமனித அடையாளமாக அமைகிறான்....

ऋतुभिः सह कवयः सदैव सम्बद्धाः। विशिष्य संस्कृतकवयः। यथा हि ऋतवः प्रतिसंवत्सरं प्रतिनवतामावहन्ति मानवेषु तथैव ऋतुवर्णनान्यपि काव्यरसिकेषु कामपि विच्छित्तिमातन्वते। ऋतुकल्याणं हि सत्यमिदमेव हृदि कृत्वा प्रवृत्तम्। नगरजीवनस्य यान्त्रिकतां मान्त्रिकतां च ध्वनदिदं चम्पूकाव्यं गद्यपद्यमिश्रितमिति सुव्यक्तमेव। ऐदम्पूर्वतया प्रायः पुरीपरिसरप्रसृतानाम् ऋतूनां विलासोऽत्र प्रपञ्चितः। बेङ्गलूरुनामके...

The Art and Science of Avadhānam in Sanskrit is a definitive work on Sāhityāvadhānam, a form of Indian classical art based on multitasking, lateral thinking, and extempore versification. Dotted throughout with tasteful examples, it expounds in great detail on the theory and practice of this unique performing art. It is as much a handbook of performance as it is an anthology of well-turned...

This anthology is a revised edition of the author's 1978 classic. This series of essays, containing his original research in various fields, throws light on the socio-cultural landscape of Tamil Nadu spanning several centuries. These compelling episodes will appeal to scholars and laymen alike.
“When superstitious mediaevalists mislead the country about its judicial past, we have to...

The cultural history of a nation, unlike the customary mainstream history, has a larger time-frame and encompasses the timeless ethos of a society undergirding the course of events and vicissitudes. A major key to the understanding of a society’s unique character is an appreciation of the far-reaching contributions by outstanding personalities of certain periods – especially in the realms of...

Prekṣaṇīyam is an anthology of essays on Indian classical dance and theatre authored by multifaceted scholar and creative genius, Śatāvadhānī Dr. R Ganesh. As a master of śāstra, a performing artiste (of the ancient art of Avadhānam), and a cultured rasika, he brings a unique, holistic perspective to every discussion. These essays deal with the philosophy, history, aesthetics, and practice of...


इदं किञ्चिद्यामलं काव्यं द्वयोः खण्डकाव्ययोः सङ्कलनरूपम्। रामानुरागानलं हि सीतापरित्यागाल्लक्ष्मणवियोगाच्च श्रीरामेणानुभूतं हृदयसङ्क्षोभं वर्णयति । वात्सल्यगोपालकं तु कदाचिद्भानूपरागसमये घटितं यशोदाश्रीकृष्णयोर्मेलनं वर्णयति । इदम्प्रथमतया संस्कृतसाहित्ये सम्पूर्णं काव्यं...


इदं खण्डकाव्यमान्तं मालिनीछन्दसोपनिबद्धं विलसति। मेनकाविश्वामित्रयोः समागमः, तत्फलतया शकुन्तलाया जननम्, मातापितृभ्यां त्यक्तस्य शिशोः कण्वमहर्षिणा परिपालनं चेति काव्यस्यास्येतिवृत्तसङ्क्षेपः।


इदं खण्डकाव्यमान्तं मालिनीछन्दसोपनिबद्धं विलसति। मेनकाविश्वामित्रयोः समागमः, तत्फलतया शकुन्तलाया जननम्, मातापितृभ्यां त्यक्तस्य शिशोः कण्वमहर्षिणा परिपालनं चेति काव्यस्यास्येतिवृत्तसङ्क्षेपः।


इयं रचना दशसु रूपकेष्वन्यतमस्य भाणस्य निदर्शनतामुपैति। एकाङ्करूपकेऽस्मिन् शेखरकनामा चित्रोद्यमलेखकः केनापि हेतुना वियोगम् अनुभवतोश्चित्रलेखामिलिन्दकयोः समागमं सिसाधयिषुः कथामाकाशभाषणरूपेण निर्वहति।


अस्मिन् स्तोत्रकाव्ये भगवन्तं शिवं कविरभिष्टौति। वसन्ततिलकयोपनिबद्धस्य काव्यस्यास्य कविकृतम् उल्लाघनाभिधं व्याख्यानं च वर्तते।

Karnataka’s celebrated polymath, D V Gundappa brings together in the third volume, some character sketches of great literary savants responsible for Kannada renaissance during the first half of the twentieth century. These remarkable...

Karnataka’s celebrated polymath, D V Gundappa brings together in the second volume, episodes from the lives of remarkable exponents of classical music and dance, traditional storytellers, thespians, and connoisseurs; as well as his...

Karnataka’s celebrated polymath, D V Gundappa brings together in the first volume, episodes from the lives of great writers, poets, literary aficionados, exemplars of public life, literary scholars, noble-hearted common folk, advocates...

Evolution of Mahabharata and Other Writings on the Epic is the English translation of S R Ramaswamy's 1972 Kannada classic 'Mahabharatada Belavanige' along with seven of his essays on the great epic. It tells the riveting...

Shiva-Rama-Krishna is an English adaptation of Śatāvadhāni Dr. R Ganesh's popular lecture series on the three great...


ಮಹಾಮಾಹೇಶ್ವರ ಅಭಿನವಗುಪ್ತ ಜಗತ್ತಿನ ವಿದ್ಯಾವಲಯದಲ್ಲಿ ಮರೆಯಲಾಗದ ಹೆಸರು. ಮುಖ್ಯವಾಗಿ ಶೈವದರ್ಶನ ಮತ್ತು ಸೌಂದರ್ಯಮೀಮಾಂಸೆಗಳ ಪರಮಾಚಾರ್ಯನಾಗಿ  ಸಾವಿರ ವರ್ಷಗಳಿಂದ ಇವನು ಜ್ಞಾನಪ್ರಪಂಚವನ್ನು ಪ್ರಭಾವಿಸುತ್ತಲೇ ಇದ್ದಾನೆ. ಭರತಮುನಿಯ ನಾಟ್ಯಶಾಸ್ತ್ರವನ್ನು ಅರ್ಥಮಾಡಿಕೊಳ್ಳಲು ಇವನೊಬ್ಬನೇ ನಮಗಿರುವ ಆಲಂಬನ. ಇದೇ ರೀತಿ ರಸಧ್ವನಿಸಿದ್ಧಾಂತವನ್ನು...


“वागर्थविस्मयास्वादः” प्रमुखतया साहित्यशास्त्रतत्त्वानि विमृशति । अत्र सौन्दर्यर्यशास्त्रीयमूलतत्त्वानि यथा रस-ध्वनि-वक्रता-औचित्यादीनि सुनिपुणं परामृष्टानि प्रतिनवे चिकित्सकप्रज्ञाप्रकाशे। तदन्तर एव संस्कृतवाङ्मयस्य सामर्थ्यसमाविष्कारोऽपि विहितः। क्वचिदिव च्छन्दोमीमांसा च...

The Best of Hiriyanna

The Best of Hiriyanna is a collection of forty-eight essays by Prof. M. Hiriyanna that sheds new light on Sanskrit Literature, Indian...

Stories Behind Verses

Stories Behind Verses is a remarkable collection of over a hundred anecdotes, each of which captures a story behind the composition of a Sanskrit verse. Collected over several years from...