Bhavabhūti: A Portrait - 1

This article is part 1 of 4 in the series Bhavabhūti: A Portrait
Bhavabhūti was a Sanskrit poet par excellence. He lived in the eighth century CE. A thorough scholar of many branches of Indian learning, he composed three plays: Mahāvīra-carita, Mālatī-mādhava and Uttara-rāma-carita. All his works bear an indelible imprint of his personality – a feature rarely seen in Sanskrit poems. This essay attempts to sketch a portrait of the great playwright using the hues and strokes available in his works. It discusses his prodigious learning, the historical context of his plays, recurring motifs in his works and several style-specific aspects.   

 

 

FIND YOUR VOICE is the advice that a budding poet receives often. Critics repeatedly encourage readers to find the poet’s voice – to identify places in a poem where the tone is most persuasive, promising or plangent. The voice is supposed to bring the poet and reader together. One would assume that this voice would be an active one. Turns out it is not. Not in ancient literature. Poets and authors in the past typically adopted an impersonal style. The passive voice was their fondest literary apparatus. Sanskrit writers used the passive voice to achieve concision and to ensure objectivity. The Sanskrit language yields well to sentence constructions in the passive voice. This was a factor in favour of littérateurs. Against this backdrop, a poet who is boldly self-assertive stands out. Bhavabhūti is one such poet. Although he has used the passive voice in the same proportion as his peers, the overall tone of his compositions is outrightly ‘active.’

*             *             *

Bhavabhūti hailed from Padmapura, a city in the Vidarbha province of Southern India. He was immensely proud of his lineage. While most Sanskrit poets are silent about their biographical details, Bhavabhūti provides a wealth of information about himself and his ancestors. The things he chooses to describe give us an idea about what he truly valued in life – not material wealth, but knowledge and cultural heritage.

From the prologues of Mahāvīra-carita and Mālatī-mādhava, we learn that he was born into a family of vaidika-brāhmaṇas. His ancestors belonged to the Taittirīya branch of the Yajurveda. Their gotra was Kāśyapa and the family name, Udumbara. They had earned the epithet ‘caraṇa-guravaḥ,’ which suggests that they used to teach their branch of the Veda and possibly ran a gurukula for that purpose. They were devout, observed several Veda-vratas (loosely, vows), performed the soma-yāga and constantly maintained the five ritual fires. They were philosophers who professed and propagated the brahma-tattva as enshrined in Vedānta. People used to respect them as ‘paṅkti-pāvanas’[1] for their prodigious learning and austere lifestyle. A person by name Mahākavi was born in this family. He had the high distinction of performing the vājapeya-yāga. Bhavabhūti was born five generations later. His grandfather was Bhaṭṭa Gopāla, a person much respected for his erudition and spotless conduct. Nīlakaṇṭha and Jatukarṇī (also spelled Jātūkarṇī) were Bhavabhūti’s parents.

His ancestors studied the Vedas and contemplated on their knowledge only to ascertain the ultimate truth for themselves – to gain philosophical clarity. They earned material wealth only to perform iṣṭa and pūrta (Vedic rites, rituals and acts of public charity). They married only to take the lineage forward through children. They lived a life of tapas.[2] In sum, these were people to whom everyone in the society looked up.  

Bhavabhūti did not live off inherited glory. He carved a niche for himself by his poetic talent and extensive learning. Being the disciple of Paramahaṃsa Jñānanidhi, he was a master of the Vedas, Vedāṅgas, Nyāya, Vyākaraṇa, Sāṅkhya, Yoga, Mīmāṃsā and Vedānta. He was also proficient in Dharmaśāstra, Arthaśāstra and Kāmaśāstra. Āyurveda, Tantraśāstra and Mantraśāstra were a few other subjects of his interest. ‘Pada-vākya-pramāṇajña’ (proficient in grammar, Vedic exegesis and epistemology) and ‘vaśya-vāk’ (master of language) were his honorifics. In his case, they are more of descriptions than titles. ‘Śrīkaṇṭha’ was another title of his. Bhavabhūti proudly pinned all his learning as a badge on his chest. He was not a man of false modesty, as we shall see.

*             *             *

The period of Bhavabhūti’s active literary activity was 700–730 CE. Bhavabhūti travelled from his hometown in Vidarbha to Padmāvatī in pursuit of a literary career. He finally settled in Kanauj under the patronage of King Yaśovarmā. During that time, Central and Northern India was home to Vaidikas, Bauddhas, Jainas, Kāpālikas and several other groups of people espousing various systems of belief, worship and philosophy.

During this period, king Nannarāja ruled Vidarbha. He belonged to the family of Rāṣṭrakūṭas, who were vassals of the Kalacūri and Calukya kings at various points. Because there was no sovereign ruler in Vidarbha, Bhavabhūti had to travel north in search of a patron. He eventually landed in Kanauj. In the same period, the intrepid king Lalitāditya ruled over Kashmir. The historical poem Rājataraṅgiṇī (4.134–44) tells us that he defeated Yaśovarmā and annexed Kanauj. Both these kings were patrons of the arts, literature and religion. Yaśovarmā was a gifted poet himself. Apart from Bhavabhūti, he had the Prakrit poet Vākpatirāja in his court. Unlike many contemporaneous poets, these two were supportive and appreciative of one another. Vākpatirāja openly acknowledged Bhavabhūti’s pre-eminence.[3]

Going by these details, one is led to assume that Bhavabhūti enjoyed the camaraderie of fellow-poets, wrote leisurely and lived happily under the patronage of a cultured king. This is partially true.

Bhavabhūti got to experience royal comfort in the second half of his life. By that time, he had already composed all his three plays. It is likely that he wrote only standalone verses in the court of Yaśovarmā.[4] Being closely acquainted with actors, choreographers and various theatre artists, he sought their help and staged his plays in the yātrā of Kālapriyanātha, the Sun deity at Kalpi.[5]

It seems that Bhavabhūti first composed five acts of Mahāvīra-carita and staged it at Kalpi. Connoisseurs of the time did not receive it well. Bhavabhūti was so embittered by this lukewarm response that he left the play unfinished (at 5.46). Other poets wrote two more acts to complete the play in later times: Vināyakabhaṭṭa wrote the northern version, Subrahmaṇya wrote the southern one. When Bhavabhūti wrote his next play Mālatī-mādhava, he stunned his critics to silence. He did not hide behind a veneer of imagery in defending his self-worth:

ये नाम केचिदिह नः प्रथयन्त्यवज्ञां

            जानन्ति ते किमपि तान्प्रति नैष यत्नः ।

उत्पत्स्यतेऽस्ति मम कोऽपि समानधर्मा

            कालो ह्ययं निरवधिर्विपुला च पृथ्वी ॥ (1.6)

Those who are indifferent to my work, let them know: my efforts are not for them. There will come along someone—why, he might be with us right now—who shares my spirit. The world is vast and time, endless.

Something seems amiss. If the literary climate of the time was generally favourable, what made the critics turn hostile to the composition of such a learned playwright? It might be that Mahāvīra-carita was an aesthetic let-down, being a product of misguided literary effort. Spectators might not have liked the changes that the poet made to the Rāmāyaṇa story. After all, the spectators were largely a bunch of unlettered men and women who had gathered to witness the yātrā. The ‘festival crowd’ responds positively to the Rāmāyaṇa story that they know and own. If something new comes up, the spectators simply walk away. The crowd had its share of discerning viewers, too. They usually do not back a poet who takes undue liberties with the storyline of a civilizational emblem like the Rāmāyaṇa.[6] This might have been the case. What is more probable is: Bhavabhūti might have had an axe to grind with contemporary poets and critics. Poets because they were wallowing in pre-set patterns and critics because they encouraged such poets. Here is evidence in point: Aestheticians delineating the nuances of plays hardly ever choose episodes from Bhavabhūti’s plays as examples. Harṣavardhana and Bhaṭṭa Nārāyaṇa are their go-to playwrights. Bhavabhūti is conspicuous by his absence because Harṣavardhana is his immediate predecessor and Bhaṭṭa Nārāyaṇa is almost his contemporary.

The scholar G K Bhat makes another plausible conjecture: Bhavabhūti belonged to a respectable family of learned brāhmaṇas. He was himself a towering scholar. And yet, he hobnobbed with actors who were looked down upon in those days. His immediate relatives must have been aghast by this break from settled family traditions. They must have vehemently criticized Bhavabhūti’s literary pursuits. “It is possible that the memory of bitter opposition from his own people never left Bhavabhūti even when he came to write his greatest work, the Uttara-rāma-carita.”[7]      

Bhavabhūti’s defiant will comes through in the fact that he went on to compose two plays and (possibly) numerous standalone verses even after receiving flak for his first composition. He might come across as an irascible, boastful man. Nevertheless, he has several virtues that are worthy of emulation. For instance, he wants critics to appreciate him for the right things. He is constantly on the lookout for learned criticism. If people commend his scholarly rigour, he is not entirely happy. He is primarily a poet and wants connoisseurs to comment on his poetic abilities:

यद्वेदाध्ययनं तथोपनिषदां साङ्ख्यस्य योगस्य च

            ज्ञानं तत्कथनेन किं न हि ततः कश्चिद्गुणो नाटके ।

यत्प्रौढित्वमुदारता च वचसां यच्चार्थतो गौरवं

            तच्चेदस्ति ततस्तदेव गमकं पाण्डित्यवैदग्ध्ययोः ॥ (Mālatī-mādhava, 1.7)

What is the use of boasting about one’s learning in the Vedas, Upaniṣads, Sāṅkhya and Yoga? They do not add any quality to a play. The real measures of scholarship and talent are felicitous expression, dignified diction and profound content.



[1] अग्र्याः सर्वेषु वेदेषु सर्वप्रवचनेषु च। श्रोत्रियान्वयजाश्चैव विज्ञेयाः पङ्किपावनाः॥ (मनुस्मृतिः, ३.११४)

[2] अस्ति दक्षिणापथे पद्मपुरं नाम नगरम्। तत्र केचित्तैत्तिरीयाः काश्यपाश्चरणगुरवः पङ्क्तिपावनाः पञ्चाग्नयो धृतव्रताः सोमपीथिन उदुम्बरनामानो ब्रह्मवादिनः प्रतिवसन्ति। तदामुष्यायणस्य तत्रभवतो वाजपेययाजिनो महाकवेः पञ्चमः सुगृहीतनाम्नो भट्टगोपालस्य पौत्रः पवित्रकीर्तेर्नीलकण्ठस्यात्म-सम्भवः श्रीकण्ठपदलाञ्छनः पदवाक्यप्रमाणज्ञो भवभूतिर्नाम जतुकर्णीपुत्रः॥(महावीरचरितम्, १.४ गद्यम्)

ते श्रोत्रियास्तत्त्वविनिश्चयाय

               भूरिश्रुतं शाश्वतमाद्रियन्ते ।

इष्टाय पूर्ताय च कर्मणेऽर्थान्

               दारानपत्याय तपोऽर्थमायुः ॥ (मालतीमाधवम्, १.५)

[3] भवभूइजलहिणिग्गअकव्वामअरसकणा इव फुरन्ति। जस्स विसेसा अज्जवि विअडेसु कहाणिवेसेसु॥ (गउडवहो, ७९९)

(भवभूतिजलनिधिगतकाव्यामृतरसकणा इव स्फुरन्ति। यस्य विशेषा अद्यापि विकटेषु कथानिवेशेषु॥)

[4] तथैव च विचित्रवक्रत्वविजृम्भितं ... भवभूतिराजशेखरविरचितेषु बन्धसौन्दर्यसुभगेषु मुक्तकेषु परिदृश्यते ॥ (वक्रोक्तिजीवितम्, १.५२)

[5] भगवतः कालप्रियनाथस्य यात्रायामार्यमिश्राः समादिशन्ति॥ (महावीरचरितम्; १.१ गद्यम्); भवभूतिः ... कविमित्रधेयमस्माकमिति भवन्तो विदाङ्कुर्वन्तु॥ (महावीरचरितम्, १.४ गद्यम्); ... संनिपतितश्च भगवतः कालप्रियनाथस्य यात्राप्रसङ्गेन नानादिगन्तवास्तव्यो महाजनसमाजः॥ (मालतीमाधवम्, १.३ गद्यम्); भवभूतिनामा ... कविर्निसर्गसौहृदेन भरतेषु ॥ (मालतीमाधवम्, १.५ गद्यम्)

[6] Ref: Ānandavardhana’s call of caution:

सन्ति सिद्धरसप्रख्या ये च रामायणादयः। कथाश्रया न तैर्योज्याः स्वेच्छा रसविरोधिनी॥ (ध्वन्यालोकः, ३.१४ परिकरश्लोकः)

[7] Bhavabhuti, pp. 15–16

 
I owe an immense debt of gratitude to Śatāvadhānī R Ganesh. Apart from providing incredible insights into the works and personality of Bhavabhūti, he handheld me throughout this essay. I extend my heartfelt thanks to Prof. L V Shantakumari, G S Raghavendra, Sandeep Balakrishna and Hari Ravikumar for their valuable inputs. I am indebted to several scholars from whose valuable works on Bhavabhūti I have benefited immensely. Of them, I must name V V Mirashi and G K Bhat. While Mirashi’s work is instructive and comprehensive, Bhat’s book is insightful and eminently readable.

To be continued.

 

   Next>>

Author(s)

About:

Shashi Kiran B N holds a bachelor’s degree in Mechanical Engineering and a master's degree in Sanskrit. His interests include Indian aesthetics, Hindu scriptures, Sanskrit and Kannada literature and philosophy.

Prekshaa Publications

The Mahābhārata is the greatest epic in the world both in magnitude and profundity. A veritable cultural compendium of Bhārata-varṣa, it is a product of the creative genius of Maharṣi Kṛṣṇa-dvaipāyana Vyāsa. The epic captures the experiential wisdom of our civilization and all subsequent literary, artistic, and philosophical creations are indebted to it. To read the Mahābhārata is to...

Shiva Rama Krishna

சிவன். ராமன். கிருஷ்ணன்.
இந்திய பாரம்பரியத்தின் முப்பெரும் கதாநாயகர்கள்.
உயர் இந்தியாவில் தலைமுறைகள் பல கடந்தும் கடவுளர்களாக போற்றப்பட்டு வழிகாட்டிகளாக விளங்குபவர்கள்.
மனித ஒற்றுமை நூற்றாண்டுகால பரிணாம வளர்ச்சியின் பரிமாணம்.
தனிநபர்களாகவும், குடும்ப உறுப்பினர்களாகவும், சமுதாய பிரஜைகளாகவும் நாம் அனைவரும் பரிமளிக்கிறோம்.
சிவன் தனிமனித அடையாளமாக அமைகிறான்....

ऋतुभिः सह कवयः सदैव सम्बद्धाः। विशिष्य संस्कृतकवयः। यथा हि ऋतवः प्रतिसंवत्सरं प्रतिनवतामावहन्ति मानवेषु तथैव ऋतुवर्णनान्यपि काव्यरसिकेषु कामपि विच्छित्तिमातन्वते। ऋतुकल्याणं हि सत्यमिदमेव हृदि कृत्वा प्रवृत्तम्। नगरजीवनस्य यान्त्रिकतां मान्त्रिकतां च ध्वनदिदं चम्पूकाव्यं गद्यपद्यमिश्रितमिति सुव्यक्तमेव। ऐदम्पूर्वतया प्रायः पुरीपरिसरप्रसृतानाम् ऋतूनां विलासोऽत्र प्रपञ्चितः। बेङ्गलूरुनामके...

The Art and Science of Avadhānam in Sanskrit is a definitive work on Sāhityāvadhānam, a form of Indian classical art based on multitasking, lateral thinking, and extempore versification. Dotted throughout with tasteful examples, it expounds in great detail on the theory and practice of this unique performing art. It is as much a handbook of performance as it is an anthology of well-turned...

This anthology is a revised edition of the author's 1978 classic. This series of essays, containing his original research in various fields, throws light on the socio-cultural landscape of Tamil Nadu spanning several centuries. These compelling episodes will appeal to scholars and laymen alike.
“When superstitious mediaevalists mislead the country about its judicial past, we have to...

The cultural history of a nation, unlike the customary mainstream history, has a larger time-frame and encompasses the timeless ethos of a society undergirding the course of events and vicissitudes. A major key to the understanding of a society’s unique character is an appreciation of the far-reaching contributions by outstanding personalities of certain periods – especially in the realms of...

Prekṣaṇīyam is an anthology of essays on Indian classical dance and theatre authored by multifaceted scholar and creative genius, Śatāvadhāni Dr. R Ganesh. As a master of śāstra, a performing artiste (of the ancient art of Avadhānam), and a cultured rasika, he brings a unique, holistic perspective...

Yaugandharam

इदं किञ्चिद्यामलं काव्यं द्वयोः खण्डकाव्ययोः सङ्कलनरूपम्। रामानुरागानलं हि सीतापरित्यागाल्लक्ष्मणवियोगाच्च श्रीरामेणानुभूतं हृदयसङ्क्षोभं वर्णयति । वात्सल्यगोपालकं तु कदाचिद्भानूपरागसमये घटितं यशोदाश्रीकृष्णयोर्मेलनं वर्णयति । इदम्प्रथमतया संस्कृतसाहित्ये सम्पूर्णं काव्यं...

Vanitakavitotsavah

इदं खण्डकाव्यमान्तं मालिनीछन्दसोपनिबद्धं विलसति। मेनकाविश्वामित्रयोः समागमः, तत्फलतया शकुन्तलाया जननम्, मातापितृभ्यां त्यक्तस्य शिशोः कण्वमहर्षिणा परिपालनं चेति काव्यस्यास्येतिवृत्तसङ्क्षेपः।

Vaiphalyaphalam

इदं खण्डकाव्यमान्तं मालिनीछन्दसोपनिबद्धं विलसति। मेनकाविश्वामित्रयोः समागमः, तत्फलतया शकुन्तलाया जननम्, मातापितृभ्यां त्यक्तस्य शिशोः कण्वमहर्षिणा परिपालनं चेति काव्यस्यास्येतिवृत्तसङ्क्षेपः।

Nipunapraghunakam

इयं रचना दशसु रूपकेष्वन्यतमस्य भाणस्य निदर्शनतामुपैति। एकाङ्करूपकेऽस्मिन् शेखरकनामा चित्रोद्यमलेखकः केनापि हेतुना वियोगम् अनुभवतोश्चित्रलेखामिलिन्दकयोः समागमं सिसाधयिषुः कथामाकाशभाषणरूपेण निर्वहति।

Bharavatarastavah

अस्मिन् स्तोत्रकाव्ये भगवन्तं शिवं कविरभिष्टौति। वसन्ततिलकयोपनिबद्धस्य काव्यस्यास्य कविकृतम् उल्लाघनाभिधं व्याख्यानं च वर्तते।

Karnataka’s celebrated polymath, D V Gundappa brings together in the third volume, some character sketches of great literary savants responsible for Kannada renaissance during the first half of the twentieth century. These remarkable...

Karnataka’s celebrated polymath, D V Gundappa brings together in the second volume, episodes from the lives of remarkable exponents of classical music and dance, traditional storytellers, thespians, and connoisseurs; as well as his...

Karnataka’s celebrated polymath, D V Gundappa brings together in the first volume, episodes from the lives of great writers, poets, literary aficionados, exemplars of public life, literary scholars, noble-hearted common folk, advocates...

Evolution of Mahabharata and Other Writings on the Epic is the English translation of S R Ramaswamy's 1972 Kannada classic 'Mahabharatada Belavanige' along with seven of his essays on the great epic. It tells the riveting...

Shiva-Rama-Krishna is an English adaptation of Śatāvadhāni Dr. R Ganesh's popular lecture series on the three great...

Bharatilochana

ಮಹಾಮಾಹೇಶ್ವರ ಅಭಿನವಗುಪ್ತ ಜಗತ್ತಿನ ವಿದ್ಯಾವಲಯದಲ್ಲಿ ಮರೆಯಲಾಗದ ಹೆಸರು. ಮುಖ್ಯವಾಗಿ ಶೈವದರ್ಶನ ಮತ್ತು ಸೌಂದರ್ಯಮೀಮಾಂಸೆಗಳ ಪರಮಾಚಾರ್ಯನಾಗಿ  ಸಾವಿರ ವರ್ಷಗಳಿಂದ ಇವನು ಜ್ಞಾನಪ್ರಪಂಚವನ್ನು ಪ್ರಭಾವಿಸುತ್ತಲೇ ಇದ್ದಾನೆ. ಭರತಮುನಿಯ ನಾಟ್ಯಶಾಸ್ತ್ರವನ್ನು ಅರ್ಥಮಾಡಿಕೊಳ್ಳಲು ಇವನೊಬ್ಬನೇ ನಮಗಿರುವ ಆಲಂಬನ. ಇದೇ ರೀತಿ ರಸಧ್ವನಿಸಿದ್ಧಾಂತವನ್ನು...

Vagarthavismayasvadah

“वागर्थविस्मयास्वादः” प्रमुखतया साहित्यशास्त्रतत्त्वानि विमृशति । अत्र सौन्दर्यर्यशास्त्रीयमूलतत्त्वानि यथा रस-ध्वनि-वक्रता-औचित्यादीनि सुनिपुणं परामृष्टानि प्रतिनवे चिकित्सकप्रज्ञाप्रकाशे। तदन्तर एव संस्कृतवाङ्मयस्य सामर्थ्यसमाविष्कारोऽपि विहितः। क्वचिदिव च्छन्दोमीमांसा च...

The Best of Hiriyanna

The Best of Hiriyanna is a collection of forty-eight essays by Prof. M. Hiriyanna that sheds new light on Sanskrit Literature, Indian...

Stories Behind Verses

Stories Behind Verses is a remarkable collection of over a hundred anecdotes, each of which captures a story behind the composition of a Sanskrit verse. Collected over several years from...